Monthly accessibility scan

City of Dodge, North Dakota — September 11, 2026

https://cityofdodge.com · scanned 2026-09-11

PASS — no violations found by the automated rules that were run

18Pages covered
2,940Individual checks passed
0Violations found
6Checks nothing could decide

Scope

Every page listed below was tested against the WCAG 2.1 Level A & AA using axe-core 4.13.0, an open-source accessibility engine. Automated testing catches many WCAG failures; it does not replace a manual review, and a PASS here means no violation was found by the rules that were run, not that the site meets every WCAG criterion.

62 automated rules were in the rule set the scanner ran

This is the rule set the engine reported for this scan. It was recorded once, from the first page measured, and the same rule set was run against every page listed below; the list is not a per-page record of which rules found something to check on that page.

"Individual checks passed" counts passing axe checks (rule x element) on each page's desktop sample; one viewport per page, not summed across viewports.

6 checks could not be decided automatically. The automated rules looked at them and could not tell, on their own, whether they pass — the usual reason is text sitting on an image, a gradient or a transparent background, where the engine cannot read the real color behind the text. They are counted here, are not counted as a violation and are not counted as a passing check; the rule involved is color-contrast. Deciding them needs a person to look. Axe checks (rule x element) that the automated rules could not decide either way, counted once per element over both screen widths and every sample.

Every page listed below was tested at desktop 1280x800 and mobile 375x812. A page can pass on a desktop and fail on a phone, so a result from one screen width alone is not a pass. A report only carries this PASS when every page was measured at both widths.

Each page was sampled 3 times (first visit ~0.6s after load; first visit ~3.5s after load; second visit (reload, same browser) ~0.6s after load). Every finding retested on a fresh visit (new context, cold storage); findings that did not reproduce are KEPT and counted as intermittent violations.

What this measurement does not cover: automated point-in-time measurement of a first and a second visit at two screen widths; content shown only under other conditions (time of day, location, third or later visits, server-side variants) or appearing outside the sample windows is not covered; automated checks do not replace a manual review.

Page by page

PageChecks passedViolationsUndecided
/199 None0
/about/158 None0
/accessibility/157 None0
/auditorium/161 None0
/community/142 None0
/contact/189 None4
/dump-ground/187 None2
/elections/151 None0
/events/248 None0
/government/161 None0
/health/139 None0
/meetings/146 None0
/news/141 None0
/ordinances/140 None0
/parks/168 None0
/privacy/146 None0
/services/156 None0
/terms/151 None0
No violations to fix this month. Every page listed above passed every automated WCAG 2.1 Level A & AA rule that was run, at both screen widths and at every sample time. 6 checks were left undecided by those rules, as set out above, and need a person to judge; they are not a violation and not a passing check. This scan is repeated monthly while the site is enrolled in ADA Shield, so new content, new pages and browser changes are re-measured.